Board Role Key in Deciding Fee Cases, Appeals Court Says (BoardIQ)
Aaron Morris was quoted in an article regarding excessive fee cases published in the August 10, 2021 edition of Board IQ.
Read moreAaron Morris was quoted in an article regarding excessive fee cases published in the August 10, 2021 edition of Board IQ.
Read moreConcerning trends for asset managers continued apace in 2020, as did efforts in courtrooms, legislatures and boardrooms to protect the industry’s underbelly.
Read moreFund directors have done little to obtain value for shareholders in connection with mergers of asset management companies, despite having ample leverage and opportunity.
Read moreAaron Morris was quoted in an article in the January 12, 2021 edition of BoardIQ.
Read moreThe investor-protection mechanisms governing mutual fund fees continue to leave some to be desired.
Read moreRecent guidance from the Mutual Fund Directors Forum on the treatment of board notes and minutes deserves a closer look.
Read moreThe case law on who bears the risks inherent in a mutual fund’s operations is becoming paradoxical, and may now require intervention by mutual fund boards.
Read moreThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, in Oxford University Bank v. Lansuppe Feeder LLC, held that Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 creates a private right of action to seek rescission of an unlawful contract.
Read moreThe Mutual Fund Directors Forum recently released guidance to fund directors for when a fund’s investment advisor is acquired by another investment advisor. The release merits close examination.
Read moreA recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit greatly missed the mark, and could be concerning for investors relying on the Investment Company Act to keep mutual fund advisors honest.
Read more