Morris Kandinov LLP represents investors in connection with vote rigging in a closed-end fund trustee election.

U.S. District Court denies defendants’ motion to dismiss in dispute over $32.5 million termination fee payment.

The Delaware Chancery Court rejected an interlocutory appeal of the Court’s prior ruling denying defendants’ motion to dismiss, permitting discovery to proceed in the case.

Morris Kandinov LLP represents investors in a dispute over a SPAC’s remaining assets in a dissolution after a failed transaction resulted in a termination fee.

Matt Levine writes about the key issue raised by three new SPAC cases filed by Morris Kandinov LLP: “Who gets the cash: the public shareholders, or the sponsors?”

The court denies defendants’ motion to dismiss claims arising from a closed-end fund’s collapse and subsequent unfair merger.

The amended complaint in the Infinity Q case includes further details regarding the flawed and deficient oversight of the Fund’s valuation of securities, which resulted in manipulation and inflation of the fund’s reported assets by hundreds of millions of dollars.

Morris Kandinov LLP has filed a case on behalf of Lightning eMotors, Inc. (previously known as GigCapital 3, Inc.), which entered the public markets through a SPAC transaction based on misrepresentations regarding its business prospects.

Morris Kandinov LLP along with two other firms will handle litigation involving a significant decline in merger value caused by Anaplan’s management.

Morris Kandinov LLP represents a group of investors who oppose the inadequate proposed Infinity Q settlement in a New York class action.